|
Is
Antarctica just the tip of the iceberg? |
|
|
Creating inclusive
teams PRESS
RELEASE The
first breakaway iceberg to capture wide public interest was in 1986. It
was about 13,000 square kilometres – the size of Luxemburg. Its
separation took with it the abandoned Argentine station and the Soviet
summer station. It took three months for the Soviets to find their
station. The
balance between polar snowfall and iceberg is vital to monitor global
climate change. At least seven smaller ice shelves are breaking up as a
result of local climate warming. Antarctica
is a living, breathing continent. This continent doubles in size for a
quarter of the year. It is in a constant state of motion, that is
undetectable by the human eye but has an awesome inertia, and moves 30 cm
a year due to pressure. Every year the potential resources of this
continent are being depleted. The
entire planet could become imbalanced through global warming. Researchers
must find away to prevent icebergs breaking away, to keep the continent
intact and avoid meltdown. Scientists must read the signs and adapt to the
changes, appreciating that prevention is the best solution. We
all walk on thin ice Understanding
the threat to the power and stability of the Antarctic under pressure and
through constant change may help to unlock other universal mysteries.
Interestingly enough, what is happening at an environmental level on the
huge continent is being paralleled there on a human level. Is what is
happening to Antarctica just the tip of the iceberg? The
scientists who go to the Antarctic to study changes during the
“winter-over” period, a nine-month period of icy cold darkness, are
themselves studied carefully by social scientists. Because they are
limited to “Isolated Confined Environments” – otherwise known as
“ICE” – they develop interesting patterns of behaviour. In these
situations, positive group functioning and group cohesiveness are put to
the ultimate test. A
researcher named Dr Jack Stuster who has studied the effects of ICE on
individuals and teams says that a crucial factor to the success of an ICE
mission is whether or not the individuals can form a cohesive group. When
the diaries of ICE individuals are analysed, there are found to be twice
as many entries concerning group interaction than any other factor. For
many years the importance of positive group interaction was completely
overlooked. Teams made up of the best scientists were sent on these
missions, but their effectiveness was severely impeded by their inability
to work together. Antarctic pioneers of the past had to be young, fit men,
who could follow orders and loved adventure. Nowadays,
psychologists frown on applicants who are simply looking for an adventure.
Instead, successful mission applicants are those who are most accepting of
others and who are able to create a rich "perceptual
environment." The responses to a psychological questionnaire and
interview are considered to be just as important as the physical exam. Evaluators
look for three main qualities, according to A.J.W. Taylor, who has written
a book on Antarctic psychology: ability, stability, and compatibility.
Ability refers to a person’s job skills and motivation, stability to his
or her level of self-awareness and emotional control, and compatibility to
his or her social skills
Finding
the resources for survival
There
is no escape anywhere, and men in particular tend to go deeper inside
themselves to survive. Individuals report that they become acutely aware
of their own inadequacies and the crowding expectations of their
associates. The ones who survive with a measure of happiness are those who
can live off of their intellectual resources, as hibernating animals live
off their fat.
Arctic
research is not only vital to understanding the environment. As many
behavioral scientists have now studied how teams function during their
stay, the implications of their findings can reach as far as outer space. One
of the main insights NASA has culled from the Antarctic research is the
importance of compatibility. All
teams go through stages of formation and meltdown that, to a degree, are
caused by circumstances beyond their immediate control. When things
“heat up” stresses cause cliques to form and individuals to break
away. Politics can threaten the group stability. If these circumstances
are not managed well – if a safety net / collecting tray is not in place
– groups and individuals may drift away or even choose to break away.
Breakaways do not, however, have the strength to face the new environment
on their own. Prevention
is better than cure. Just as scientists are researching and monitoring the
icebergs, systems need to be put in place to monitor and manage teams. We
need to try to control the team environment, and have a back-up system in
place for when there is extra stress on the group. Because teams are the
foundation of organisations, they must be supported through times of
change. We
all walk on thin ice, but it is possible to survive together by supporting
each other. |
Article |
|
Is the future of your teams ‘ON THIN ICE’? Virtual, cross-cultural, or ‘silo minded’ teams require extra cohesion to function positively for corporate success. If your organization can take precaution to prevent a crack for your teams then you can avoid the dangers of ‘on thin ice’.
You are invited to join the Antarctic
expedition - Keep pace with rapid technological and organizational change - Become motivated to achieve superior performance - Improve group responsibility, decision making and support. Use Tirian’s unique team development to ‘break the ice’ for particularly challenged teams.
End Quote: "Prevention is better than cure. Just as scientists are researching and monitoring the icebergs, systems need to be put in place to monitor and manage teams."
"There has been much work done over the years on group dynamics. Among the most useful is that which identifies the deep underlying anxiety felt at either being so overwhelmed by the group that we lose our individual identity, or conversely, being rejected or expelled by the group. This subtext operates in every group, almost as if there were another group working at the level of the instinctive, the emotional and the psychological. When a group is working properly, members operate as autonomous individuals from a position of mature personal authority."
|
|
|
i n t e g r a t e Dimension 1: Justified Fun Programs - On thin ICE This program is designed to help individuals to recognise the need for positive teamwork in achieving goals more creatively and effectively, both within and between teams. Dimension 2: Keynote Talk and Seminar- Managing Virtual Teams Dimension
3:
Articles - Is
Antarctica just the tip of the iceberg?
Contact us now for more details www.tirian.com Copyright © 2000-3 [Tirian]. All rights reserved.
|
|