|
“An
issue ignored is a crisis ensured”
“Business today suffers from the perception that its leaders are
complacent, greedy and unconcerned about the long-term welfare of their
companies and the employees that have not been shown the door through
downsizing. Government regulators are considered to be in the pockets of
industry, examples of bureaucratic sloth. The media is widely believed
to sensationalize the news as a means to establish its own agenda.
Consumer activists, often considered to be agents for constructive
change are being criticized for exaggerating the dangers facing society.
To understand why, it is worth examining some interesting trends
affecting the changing relationship between business and society.
The role of government and corporations in society is being challenged
to a much greater degree than ever before.
- The social landscape is
changing
- Corporate loyalty is no
longer a given
- People are less trusting of
those in authority
- Public policy formulation is
still an evolutionary process
- Corporate behavior is under
much greater scrutiny
In
the area of the triple bottom line – in the achievement of a balance
between commercial success, environmental responsibility and social
justice – the stakes are becoming much higher. Businesses should now
understand that successful companies are those which are outward facing
and understand not only what their audiences are, but also what they
think and what they want. They must realize that issues can be viewed in
many different ways and emotion is a powerful perception changer.
Companies that can minimize crisis are the ones that are able to move
away from one-way information flow towards active dialogue with a wide
range of stakeholder groups. How issues are handled can mean the
difference between a crisis out of control and a proactive solution –
between profit and loss. Many issues can be anticipated and successfully
managed.
In
one survey, 95% of people questionned felt that ‘issues’ in their
companies were handled in a reactive and ad hoc manner, often to the
detriment of reputation and financial performance goals. Research has
shown that effective use of issues management techniques and awareness
can:
- Increase market share
- Enhance corporate reputation
- Save money
- Build important relationships
The
earlier a relevant issue can be identified and managed in terms of a
systematic organizational response, the more likely it is that it the
organization can resolve conflict and minimalism cost implications to
its advantage.
Companies must learn to determine the urgency of the issues and need to
realize that as the issue turns into a crisis if not dealt with
adequately, management’s attention evaporates in favor of more
immediate and pressing matters. Urgent matters take precedent over
important long term matters. The longer an issue survives the fewer
choices are available and the more it costs. Early action allows for
flexible and creative thinking.
The
top 250 companies in the UK claimed that damage to reputation was the
biggest business risk they faced. Good will is believed to account for
71% of total market capital.
The
cost of damage to a company from mismanaging a crisis or perceived
crisis can run into the millions of dollars, and in Exxon Valdez’s case
an estimated $13 billion."
(Summarized from
Regester & Larkin 2002)
|
XPLORE

Role Play Kit
Based
on actual media reports, over 600 cards covering the first half of
2003, weave a complex story creating 100's of variables.
|
"Catch Me if you Dare", although fictional, has been created from
the following actual events:
SARS: The
ultimate scare
BALI BOMB: The
perfect storm
BRENT SPAR:
The green issue
MONSANTO: The
politics of genetics
DARK WINTER:
The definitive weapon.
The above
case studies are also discussed in the workbook: "Strategies
for Action" |
|